Skip to main content

Coal Plants and Corruption

 Coal Plants and Corruption

climate-corruption
Coal and Corruption (image: Getty)



Written by Sean Kang (high school intern, June/July 2021)


According to a study conducted by Wood Mackenzie, an established consultancy group that supplies data about chemicals, global energy, and renewables, states that coal plants will “...continue to be the dominant fuel source in power generation in Southeast Asia, [and] its use will grow and peak in 2027 before slowing” (Tan).


Today, coal plants still appear to be a prevalent source of energy in countries concentrated in the South-East Asia region and continue to pose grave threats to its surrounding environment: acid rain, global warming, water pollution, air pollution, and etc. However, although such harmful implications of the coal plant industry seem apparent to the public and environmentalists, one greatly overlooked aspect is the corruption that surrounds the construction of these coal plants. In this context, corruption, according to Transparency International, an anti-corruption organization, is “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (What is Corruption?). 


So how is corruption related to the coal plant industry and why is it the determining factor to harmful environmental impact?


The answer, in simple terms, is both money and power. One notorious example is the Cirebon 2 coal plant project, which is a “$2bn expansion to add a 1,000MW ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant” (Cirebon Coal-Fired Power) in West Java, Indonesia. Although this project’s intended purpose was to meet Indonesia’s growing energy demand, there was speculation surrounding how the money was handled.


Egi Primayogha, a researcher with the NGO Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), asserts that “It’s become clear to see that coal power plant projects are a bribery hotspot for many people” (Gokkon). In fact, one major shareholder to the Cirebon 2 project, the Hyundai Engineering and Construction, admits to bribing an Indonesian politician a fee of “6.5 billion rupiahs ($460,000) out of a requested 9.5 billion rupiah” (Min-Ho).


In another scandalous coal-plant project in Riau, Indonesia, a Golkar Party politician Eni Maulani Saragih was accused of accepting 4.75 billion rupiahs and sentenced to six years in prison.


As the prevalence of corruption surrounding bribery and money laundering in multi-million dollar coal projects continues to increase, government officials should enforce policies and more importantly, environmentalists should be aware that the root cause of environmental destruction is corruption.


So how can we as a society shift the tides so that future generations experience a greener Earth unaffected by the forms of corruption so common today?


The first step to take is to urge the need for change in the government’s environmental policies. As evidenced by the South Korean Climate Transparency Report of 2020, one key opportunity to enhance climate change is lifting renewable energy barriers. Countries like South Korea have a stringent policy regarding land and maritime policies, and it is absolutely necessary should the government make reforms in such areas.


The next step to take is to verify that there is no form of corruption taking place when a big environmental project is implemented. It is crucial to prevent corruption by understanding the law and other regulations, conducting a risk assessment, protecting whistleblowers, and reviewing policies. 



Citations

https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/03/02/golkar-politician-eni-saragih-gets-six-years-has-political-rights-suspended.html 


https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/companies/8-ways-to-prevent-corruption-in-your-business-bb33d11d-7e26-4590-9fc8-c123f7d77d9f 


https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption 


https://www.power-technology.com/projects/cirebon-coal-fired-power-plant-expansion-west-java/ 


https://news.mongabay.com/2020/11/indonesia-coal-power-plant-cirebon-korea-land-pollution-corruption/ 


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/01/coal-is-still-king-in-southeast-asia-despite-clean-energy-efforts.html 


https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2019/05/693_268175.html 



Reviewed by:

Abraham Sumalinog



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes

 30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes 30 th Green Climate Fund Board Meeting 4-7 September 2021 (Virtual meeting)   The GCF's Board Members were expected to approve 13 Funding Proposals equivalent to USD1.2 billion and accredit 4 Accredited Entities (actually for re-accreditation), and also address various policy gaps and governance issues.   1 st Day (4 October 2021) The first day was slow which was spent on discussing procedural matters The co-chair from Mexico (Jose) opened the meeting by welcoming the new Board members and their alternates Discussion on the Technical Sessions held a week before B30 on the Simplified Approval Process (SAP), and Climate Rationale was done without considering the evaluations made by the IEU. The co-chair responded by saying that the independent evaluation of SAP and Climate Rationale are already part of the proposed agenda. Due to some objections from a couple of Board members, the co-chairs agreed to add another agenda item rel

Climate and COP Negotiations Lobbying Crisis

 Climate and COP Lobbying Crisis The climate crisis is a pressing concern that must be addressed rapidly and effectively with concrete action. How?  Climate crisis issues can be resolved by reducing emissions and increasing renewable energy sources, transitioning to a Circular Economy, investing in green infrastructure, and adopting holistic strategies that address the underlying causes of climate change. These measures are essential if we are to avoid catastrophic environmental consequences. Furthermore, they create an opportunity for innovation and economic growth by developing and implementing new low-carbon technologies and sustainable business models. It is also essential to build resilience and adaptive capacity in our communities. This means investing in infrastructure that helps people cope with the impacts of climate change, such as sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and flooding, among other methods. It also involves developing innovative approaches to reduce emissions a

COP26: Article 6 Outcomes

 COP26: Article 6 Outcomes Image Source: eu.boell.org This article is a brief version of the article published by twn.org on the results of negotiations among Parties on issues related to the contentious Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (2015) Article 6 Outcomes on Market/Non-market Approaches Article 6 is PA’s ‘cooperative approaches’ among Parties involving the use of market and non-market mechanisms of their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)’s implementation Establishment of the ‘Glasgow Committee on Non-market Approaches’ – a win for DCs -        This formal institutional mechanism can advance the non-market approaches (NMAs), which was initially resisted by developed countries -        Considered a victory under the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.8 No Decision for a Mandatory Contribution – a loss for DCs -        The market-based approach under PA’s Article 6.2 is a loss to the developing countries as there was no decision reached for a mandatory contribution t