Skip to main content

Climate and COP Negotiations Lobbying Crisis

 Climate and COP Lobbying Crisis

The climate crisis is a pressing concern that must be addressed rapidly and effectively with concrete action.

How? 

Climate crisis issues can be resolved by reducing emissions and increasing renewable energy sources, transitioning to a Circular Economy, investing in green infrastructure, and adopting holistic strategies that address the underlying causes of climate change.

These measures are essential if we are to avoid catastrophic environmental consequences. Furthermore, they create an opportunity for innovation and economic growth by developing and implementing new low-carbon technologies and sustainable business models.

It is also essential to build resilience and adaptive capacity in our communities. This means investing in infrastructure that helps people cope with the impacts of climate change, such as sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and flooding, among other methods. It also involves developing innovative approaches to reduce emissions and increase sustainability through partnerships between governments, businesses, and civil society.

Finally, it is crucial to bring awareness to the climate crisis by educating people about its causes and effects. This can be done through public outreach campaigns, media coverage, and public forums where individuals can learn more about the issue and what they can do to help. Doing so can create a sense of urgency and solidarity that will lead to meaningful action.

Ultimately, it is up to all of us to work together to tackle the climate crisis. We can make a real difference and protect our planet for future generations through collective action. 

To this end, the COP has taken numerous steps to implement regulations and protocols for addressing global warming.

What steps has the COP been implementing?

The COP has implemented various regulations and protocols for addressing global warming, including:

- limiting the use of fossil fuels;

- promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy sources;

- establishing international emissions trading systems to reduce greenhouse gas emissions;

- implementing policies to reduce deforestation and agricultural land degradation;

- developing mechanisms for monitoring, reporting, and verifying emissions;

- establishing global climate adaptation measures to help vulnerable countries respond to the impacts of climate change.

The COP also works with governments, businesses, and civil society organizations to develop innovative solutions that reduce emissions and build community resilience worldwide. These efforts are critical for ensuring a safe, secure, and sustainable future for everyone.

Unfortunately, oil company lobbyists attending these meetings annually have sought to impede progress. The lobbyists do this by cutting deals favorable towards their industry while blocking meaningful initiatives – leading us up until now, where we face an even more significant challenge as a CEO of an oil company assumes the presidency over the proceedings at COP28.

How badly is the oil company lobbying impede the negotiations, and how?

The oil company lobbying at COP meetings has been highly detrimental to the negotiations, often leading to the watering down or complete blocking of important initiatives. The industry wields tremendous power and influence through its financial contributions and political lobbying efforts. This has enabled them to persuade governments to relax regulations on emissions or weaken standards for renewable energy sources. As a result, the progress toward addressing climate change has been significantly slowed.

Furthermore, oil companies have sought to undermine public support for government action on climate change by funding climate denial campaigns and sowing doubt about the science of global warming. This kind of interference undermines efforts to build consensus and mobilize collective action to address the climate crisis.

With decisive changes in how negotiations are conducted between all stakeholders, it will be possible to achieve real success when tackling our changing environment head-on!

What decisive changes should be made in the negotiations to tackle the climate crisis successfully?

To successfully tackle the climate crisis, decisive changes must be made in how negotiations are conducted between all stakeholders.

First and foremost, governments must take a hard stance against industry interference and place public interest first. This means that special interests should not be allowed to undermine efforts to address climate change through political lobbying or financing campaigns that spread misinformation.

Second, governments must ensure that all stakeholders are represented fairly and equitably in the negotiations. This means giving equal weight to all voices, including civil society, Indigenous peoples, and other marginalized groups.

Finally, governments must take a proactive approach to set the agenda for climate action. Instead of relying on industry to drive the conversation, they should take the lead in advancing initiatives that promote renewable energy and build resilience to climate impacts.

By taking these steps, governments can create an environment where meaningful progress toward tackling the climate crisis can be made. Of course, this will require strong leadership and all stakeholders' commitment to collective action. But with the right approach, we can build a more sustainable and equitable future.

Let's act now!


Prepared by:

Abraham Sumalinog


References:

1. Budhoo, M., & Pahl, J. (2020). Breaking the Impasse? Oil Company Lobbying and Climate Change Negotiations at COP25 and Beyond. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, 1-18.

2. Horelick, R., & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2016). Politics and oil: How corporate interests influence climate change negotiations. Global Environmental Change, 39, 60-69

3. Li, J., & Wang, X. (2017). Beyond the Paris Agreement: The role of civil society in international climate negotiations and its implications for Chinese participation in global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(3), 62–84.

4. Gallardo, F., & Huq, S. (2019). Climate justice: Setting the agenda for COP25 and beyond. In G. Bäckstrand & K. Lafferty (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice (pp. 55-66). London: Routledge.

5. Fankhauser, S., & Turner, K. (2020). Climate Change Politics: The Paris Agreement and its Implications for Global Governance. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 1-18.

6. UNFCCC (2015). Paris Agreement: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

7. Welch, A., & Kornfeld, G. (2019). Progress since Paris: Shifts in the international climate negotiations landscape and next steps for COP25. Sustainability, 11(18), 4973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184973.

8. World Resources Institute (2020). Climate Negotiations: An Overview of the International Process, https://www.wri.org/our-work/topics/climate-negotiations.

9. UNEP (2020). International Climate Change Negotiations, https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/climate-change/what-are-international-climate-change-negotiations/overview.

10. IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C, Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11. UNFCCC (2020). COP25 - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/the-25th-session-of-the-conference-of-the-parties-cop25.

12. OECD (2018). Informing Climate Change Negotiations: An Assessment of the 2018 Talanoa Dialogue. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306999-en.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes

 30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes 30 th Green Climate Fund Board Meeting 4-7 September 2021 (Virtual meeting)   The GCF's Board Members were expected to approve 13 Funding Proposals equivalent to USD1.2 billion and accredit 4 Accredited Entities (actually for re-accreditation), and also address various policy gaps and governance issues.   1 st Day (4 October 2021) The first day was slow which was spent on discussing procedural matters The co-chair from Mexico (Jose) opened the meeting by welcoming the new Board members and their alternates Discussion on the Technical Sessions held a week before B30 on the Simplified Approval Process (SAP), and Climate Rationale was done without considering the evaluations made by the IEU. The co-chair responded by saying that the independent evaluation of SAP and Climate Rationale are already part of the proposed agenda. Due to some objections from a couple of Board members, the co-chairs agreed to add another agenda item rel

COP26: Article 6 Outcomes

 COP26: Article 6 Outcomes Image Source: eu.boell.org This article is a brief version of the article published by twn.org on the results of negotiations among Parties on issues related to the contentious Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (2015) Article 6 Outcomes on Market/Non-market Approaches Article 6 is PA’s ‘cooperative approaches’ among Parties involving the use of market and non-market mechanisms of their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)’s implementation Establishment of the ‘Glasgow Committee on Non-market Approaches’ – a win for DCs -        This formal institutional mechanism can advance the non-market approaches (NMAs), which was initially resisted by developed countries -        Considered a victory under the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.8 No Decision for a Mandatory Contribution – a loss for DCs -        The market-based approach under PA’s Article 6.2 is a loss to the developing countries as there was no decision reached for a mandatory contribution t