Skip to main content

Climate Governance Integrity and Art

 


By: Abraham Sumalinog

Latest Climate Change Issues in Korea

A sounding almost ninety percent of climate scientists agreed that climate change is indeed happening. The consensus of climate change's truth and its adverse impacts do not take sides as it is being experienced by all people globally but in varying degrees. In South Korea, the most apparent impacts of climate change are the erratic changes in weather conditions,[1] including the unusual torrential rains and stronger storms, rising temperature and heatwaves, a regional adaptation of plants and fruit trees, dryer season that intensify forest fires, rising seawater levels, and water shortage, among other obvious signs.

The untimely climate change crisis is due to the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG[2]). Among those gases, carbon dioxide contributes an immense amount to the greenhouse effects, mainly caused by anthropogenic activities. We, human beings, are the culprits responsible for the devastating impacts of climate change through our daily activities called carbon footprints. Massive emissions of carbon dioxide come from industry (factories, farms and land use, animals), energy (e.g., coal and nuclear plants), commercial and residential, agriculture, land use, and forestry.[3]

Overuse of fossil resources for fuels (e.g., crude oil, coal), depletion of carbon sinks (e.g., rainforests, lakes, rivers, marshlands), waste and pollutions, and global devastation of land and the sea makes it impossible for the Earth to absorb the massive amount of anthropogenic gas emissions.

 

Victims of climate change

In Korea, most of the directly affected groups are farmers, fisherfolks and marine farmers, and residents (and businesses) living nearby the sea and mountainsides. Farmers living out of planting fruit trees claim their products are dwindling due to changes in regional temperature and weather conditions. Aside from the lesser harvest of fruit and vegetable products, the farms suffer from heavy torrential rains and floods[4], storms, and other related erratic harsh weather conditions. Also, the supply of water resources is getting less.

Fisherfolks could no longer catch their usual seafood products in the same sea territories because the water temperature is changing (warmer). The warming seawater affects the marine ecology driving away native fish to other areas or welcomes tropical fish species (e.g., trumpet fish). Fishponds cannot anymore raise the usual fish because they are affected by destructive storms, and rising water temperature reduces oxygen contents.

As seen during the recent storms that ravage the country, residents living nearby the sea and mountainsides suffer the surge of sea waves, flooding, and landslides. Such unusual events caused damages to houses, shops, fishing boats, residential areas, businesses, and public structures, among other infrastructures. Besides, research sources reported that the South Korean seawater level keeps rising, affecting around three million people and infrastructures, including the new Incheon international airport, power plants, among others. The highest level is occurring on Jeju Island's surrounding seawater.[5]

 

Impacts of climate change to Korea and worldwide

Since South Korea has a big economy and enough capacity to adapt, it could adjust and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Other developed countries can do likewise in varying degrees. Building seawalls, sturdy houses and other infrastructures, and advanced emergency response agencies and technology can help the country adapt and reduce risks and damages.

However, most developing countries, emerging economies, and especially the small island states and countries would suffer the most the brunt of climate change. Many small islands (Tonga, The Maldives, etc.) will eventually sink, and low-lying lands and cities (most areas in Bangladesh, Miami, etc.) will be underwater in the next twenty years and beyond.

Worldwide, regions and countries will experience extreme heatwaves, pestilence, expansion of deserts, land and territorial conflicts, widened environmental devastation, melting of icebergs and ice sheets, erratic weather changes, and more related impacts of climate change.[6]

 

Transparency International's response to climate issues

Part of Transparency International's (TI) program is on climate governance integrity. At present, there are eight TI Chapters, including TI Korea, that are actively engaging in climate-related integrity and corruption issues. Fundamentally, we are involved in various activities and programs, including climate governance policy monitoring, climate projects monitoring, recommending and providing transparency and anti-corruption proposals and inputs for institutions such as climate change funding institutions (e.g., Green Climate Fund, Climate Investment Funds, Environmental Fund).

Our activities and programs are not precisely on environmental and climate change per se, but the integrity and transparency issues related to the environment and climate. By pushing and promoting transparency and anti-corruption actions at various levels in institutions and society, environmental and climate actions will undoubtedly achieve their intentions making developing nations adapt to the impacts and mitigate carbon emissions. To strengthen our efforts and expand our activities, we are working with various stakeholders, including agencies, officials, activities, organizations, civil society groups, and individuals dedicated to promoting climate governance integrity actions.


Does art help?

Art is as old as human civilization, and our early ancestors us arts (e.g., cave paintings) to tell stories and messages that everyone can understand regarding their present circumstances. Similarly, we use arts (such as paintings and sketches) to convey messages and symbols that are quite different from slogans.

Perceiving art demands attention, and processing art requires parts of the brain that are not usually accessed by typical communications about climate change. Art typically uses novel metaphors, analogies, or narratives, which climate communication generally lacks. Art can also provide people with visualizations of the problem and give them a personal experience with the subject matter, which is especially essential regarding climate change as many people still see it as an abstract issue that poses no direct threat. Art may also help establish a group identity and give people a sense of being supported in their efforts to help combat climate change.

Through artwork pieces, Korean civil society will be encouraged to help them push the government to establish climate finance anti-corruption policies and identify areas of policy strengthening and develop an action plan for reforms.


Messages of "Narcissus" and "Smoking"   

The messages symbolized by "Narcissus" and "Smoking" pastel paintings are straightforward that viewers can readily perceive and understand. The 'Narcissus' painting depicts the destructive, selfish, and inward-looking attitude of individuals, authorities, or people with entrusted power but who use their status and position to abuse or steal public and private resources for personal or political gains. Almost similar messages can be gained from the "Smoking" pastel painting.

'Narcissus' and 'Smoking' represent a mindset that resources are unlimited and that we can disrespect nature by thoughtlessly using them. 'Narcissus' art depicts a self-absorbed individual (e.g., leader, CEO), while 'Smoking' art refers to a group of people or corporate greed. Both artworks fully portray humans' present activities that caused the devastating effects on Earth's ecology and all creatures brought about by climate change.

Narcissus and Smoking are types of people who harm not only nature but also innocent people who understand that we all depend on nature's giftedness. Both groups of people see nature as profits and self-gratification means. This mindset comes from the misunderstanding that 'men' are more valuable and superior to nature. However, nature proves that we are wrong through the consequences of our 'narcissistic' actions.

We use natural resources, ironically, not for our well-being but for our self-gratification and self-destructive cravings. Therefore, we should realize and understand now that limiting our exploitation of natural resources is life-giving. Putting 'limits' is life-giving. Not all resources should be exploited rampantly. Natural resources are not unlimited as the business world is trying to brainwash people. Selfishness and greed, more often than not, come with corrupt activities. The unscrupulous individuals and companies are often profit-oriented. They do anything to achieve unlimited gains that are not only unjust to their workers but also eventually destroy the integrity of the environment and society.

We are free to use natural resources with responsibility: to be ethical, moral, and be concerned for others by not harming them. The COVID-19 pandemic has proven that nature has limits and that humans should realize by now that putting limits to our consumption is life-giving and even freeing. 

Transparency and integrity are necessary practices to ensure that every responsible entity (e.g., companies) holds to account their activities and actions. Selfishness and greed, more often than not, come with corrupt activities.

Most corrupt people and entities believe that resources are unlimited. For that reason, they are doomed to fail, not alone but dragging down the society that supports them or not taking actions to remedy the corrupt practices.


Challenges and Hopes

Generally, the most challenging overarching aspect in facing the issues brought about by climate change is politics involved in the matter in Korea and globally. Specifically, Korean society faces significant energy transition challenges, waste disposal, environment, climate policies, political will, and environmental/climate projects integrity.

The transition from fossil energy to renewable energy use is still the topmost challenge for the Korean government to fulfill its commitment to the Paris Agreement (PA) by reducing its gas emissions as outlined on its nationally determined contributions. To fulfill that PA commitment, the nation should establish more robust "green" policies and guidelines that pull together leaders, financial institutions, private sectors, and businesses to draw up concrete adaptation and mitigation policies. Such policies should lead to creating infrastructures and projects that will be implemented and governed with integrity and transparency.

On the other hand, Korean society is becoming more aware of climate change and its devastating impacts on everything. However, others are not convinced yet or lack knowledge, or find the issue still abstract as it does not affect them directly yet. However, there are various signs and concrete proofs of hope that society will adapt and establish the instruments for a safer environment. For example, the present government is exerting efforts to promote clean energy resources and create jobs via the establishment of industries that produce renewable energy technologies.

In addition, Korean society and its vibrant civil society organizations are pushing not only the policymakers but also all sectors in society to 'act now' to prevent further environmental disasters and health risks being brought about by climate change.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes

 30th Green Climate Fund Meeting Notes 30 th Green Climate Fund Board Meeting 4-7 September 2021 (Virtual meeting)   The GCF's Board Members were expected to approve 13 Funding Proposals equivalent to USD1.2 billion and accredit 4 Accredited Entities (actually for re-accreditation), and also address various policy gaps and governance issues.   1 st Day (4 October 2021) The first day was slow which was spent on discussing procedural matters The co-chair from Mexico (Jose) opened the meeting by welcoming the new Board members and their alternates Discussion on the Technical Sessions held a week before B30 on the Simplified Approval Process (SAP), and Climate Rationale was done without considering the evaluations made by the IEU. The co-chair responded by saying that the independent evaluation of SAP and Climate Rationale are already part of the proposed agenda. Due to some objections from a couple of Board members, the co-chairs agreed to add another agenda item rel

Climate and COP Negotiations Lobbying Crisis

 Climate and COP Lobbying Crisis The climate crisis is a pressing concern that must be addressed rapidly and effectively with concrete action. How?  Climate crisis issues can be resolved by reducing emissions and increasing renewable energy sources, transitioning to a Circular Economy, investing in green infrastructure, and adopting holistic strategies that address the underlying causes of climate change. These measures are essential if we are to avoid catastrophic environmental consequences. Furthermore, they create an opportunity for innovation and economic growth by developing and implementing new low-carbon technologies and sustainable business models. It is also essential to build resilience and adaptive capacity in our communities. This means investing in infrastructure that helps people cope with the impacts of climate change, such as sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and flooding, among other methods. It also involves developing innovative approaches to reduce emissions a

COP26: Article 6 Outcomes

 COP26: Article 6 Outcomes Image Source: eu.boell.org This article is a brief version of the article published by twn.org on the results of negotiations among Parties on issues related to the contentious Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (2015) Article 6 Outcomes on Market/Non-market Approaches Article 6 is PA’s ‘cooperative approaches’ among Parties involving the use of market and non-market mechanisms of their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)’s implementation Establishment of the ‘Glasgow Committee on Non-market Approaches’ – a win for DCs -        This formal institutional mechanism can advance the non-market approaches (NMAs), which was initially resisted by developed countries -        Considered a victory under the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.8 No Decision for a Mandatory Contribution – a loss for DCs -        The market-based approach under PA’s Article 6.2 is a loss to the developing countries as there was no decision reached for a mandatory contribution t